Healthcare Delivery & EducationComplicationsType 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Structured case management may improve recovery after CABG in older adults with type 2 diabetes

Last updated June 2, 2026

Key finding

In a 6-month randomized trial of 168 elderly patients with type 2 diabetes after off-pump CABG, structured multidisciplinary case management improved cardiac function, HbA1c, walking distance, lipids, and quality-of-life outcomes versus routine care.

This trial tested a structured case management program in older adults with type 2 diabetes recovering from off-pump CABG. Compared with routine care alone, the program improved heart function, HbA1c, walking distance, lipid measures, and patient-reported recovery over 6 months.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

High

Study type

Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)

Follow-up

Medium-Term (3–12 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

In a 6-month randomized trial of 168 elderly patients with type 2 diabetes after off-pump CABG, structured multidisciplinary case management improved cardiac function, HbA1c, walking distance, lipids, and quality-of-life outcomes versus routine care.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Zhai W, Yu H, Li Y, Zhang L, Li Q. Improved cardiac function and glycemic control in elderly diabetic patients through structured case management after CABG. Med Sci Monit. 2026;32:e952109. doi:10.12659/MSM.952109

Main Effects

Structured case management ↑ left ventricular ejection fraction at 6 months

Structured case management ↓ HbA1c, triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol

Structured case management ↑ walking distance, quality of life, and daily living scores

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Structured multidisciplinary case management and 6-minute walk distance, Activities of daily living, HDL cholesterol, and 8 more.

Primary intervention

Structured multidisciplinary case management

Primary outcomes

  • 6-minute walk distance
  • Activities of daily living
  • HDL cholesterol

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

11
Evidence pairs
11
Relationships
3
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

High contributionHigh confidenceNetwork score: 80

3

Related topics

11

Evidence pairs

301

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 11 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Uses a randomized study design signal
  • Linked to 3 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker

Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Primary evidence

Evidence relationship

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Quality of Life Outcomes

Related evidence

Evidence relationship

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and HbA1c

Save evidence

Evidence relationship

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Adipokine and Angiogenic Markers

Save evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

6-minute walk distance

Structured multidisciplinary case management → 6-minute walk distance

Structured multidisciplinary case management → 6-minute walk distance

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Activities of daily living

Structured multidisciplinary case management → Activities of daily living

Structured multidisciplinary case management → Activities of daily living

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

HbA1c

Structured multidisciplinary case management → HbA1c

Structured multidisciplinary case management → HbA1c

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Score 69 · Based on 2 studies
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
100
consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 2 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

HDL cholesterol

Structured multidisciplinary case management → HDL cholesterol

Structured multidisciplinary case management → HDL cholesterol

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

LDL cholesterol

Structured multidisciplinary case management → LDL cholesterol

Structured multidisciplinary case management → LDL cholesterol

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)

Structured multidisciplinary case management → Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)

Structured multidisciplinary case management → Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter

Structured multidisciplinary case management → Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter

Structured multidisciplinary case management → Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Left ventricular end-systolic diameter

Structured multidisciplinary case management → Left ventricular end-systolic diameter

Structured multidisciplinary case management → Left ventricular end-systolic diameter

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Quality of life

Structured multidisciplinary case management → Quality of life

Structured multidisciplinary case management → Quality of life

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Total cholesterol

Structured multidisciplinary case management → Total cholesterol

Structured multidisciplinary case management → Total cholesterol

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Triglycerides

Structured multidisciplinary case management → Triglycerides

Structured multidisciplinary case management → Triglycerides

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • The primary endpoint, LVEF change, improved by 6.2 percentage points versus routine care
  • HbA1c improved by 1.3 percentage points and multiple lipid outcomes also favored the intervention
  • Functional and patient-reported recovery outcomes improved while serious adverse events were similar between groups
who this applies

Who this applies to

Older adults aged 65 years or above

keep in mind

Keep in Mind

The intervention was multi-component, so the study cannot isolate which component mattered most

between the lines

Between the Lines

  • Single-center study in a tertiary hospital in Tianjin
  • Participants and care teams were not blinded to the intervention
  • The population was selected as relatively low-risk for rehabilitation, which may limit generalizability
  • Follow-up lasted 6 months, so longer-term cardiovascular outcomes remain uncertain

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and HbA1c, Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Cardiovascular Outcomes.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve quality of life outcomes?

Strong Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs appears to improve Quality of Life Outcomes.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Quality of life

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 10 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
10 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve HbA1c?

Strong Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve HbA1c.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    HbA1c

    EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 69.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 30 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
30 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve adipokine and angiogenic markers?

Strong Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve Adipokine and Angiogenic Markers.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    HDL cholesterol

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

  2. 2

    LDL cholesterol

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

  3. 3

    Total cholesterol

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 7 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
7 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve activities of daily living?

Strong Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs appears to improve Activities of Daily Living.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Activities of daily living

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 4 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
4 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.