Supported telemonitoring improved HbA1c and blood pressure in type 2 diabetes
Key takeaway:
In adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes in UK family practice, supported telemonitoring lowered HbA1c and ambulatory blood pressure more than usual care over 9 months, without changing weight.
Study at a glance
Study type
RCTs
duration
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Intervention
Telemonitoring
Outcomes
HbA1c, Systolic blood pressure, Diastolic blood pressure, Body weight
Funding
Non-industry sponsored
What was studied
Whether supported telemonitoring improves diabetes and blood pressure control in primary care
What they found
- HbA1c ↓ by 0.51% versus usual care
- Systolic blood pressure ↓ by 3.06 mmHg
- Diastolic blood pressure ↓ by 2.17 mmHg
- Body weight ↔ with no clear between-group difference
mainEffects
HbA1c ↓ by 0.51% versus usual care
Systolic blood pressure ↓ by 3.06 mmHg
Diastolic blood pressure ↓ by 2.17 mmHg
Body weight ↔ with no clear between-group difference
Evidence Suggest
- Adjusted mean HbA1c was 5.60 mmol/mol lower in the telemonitoring group at 9 months.
- Ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure were both lower with telemonitoring than with usual care.
- Weight, prescribing patterns, and most health service use measures were not clearly different between groups.
Who this applies to
These findings apply most directly to adults with type 2 diabetes in primary care who have poor glycemic control, can use home monitoring equipment, and have access to remote clinician follow-up. The results are especially relevant to UK-style family practice settings, but may also inform similar telehealth programs elsewhere.
Keep in Mind
This was a structured telemonitoring program, not simple unsupported self-monitoring. Participants transmitted readings, and clinicians reviewed results regularly and contacted patients when needed. The benefits may depend on that support model, patient engagement, and the local health system’s ability to respond to incoming data. It is also not yet clear whether the improvement lasts after monitoring stops.
Between the Lines
- Participants and clinicians could not be fully blinded to group assignment.
- Only a minority of invited eligible patients joined the trial, so participants may not represent all patients with poorly controlled diabetes.
- The study did not show how long the benefit lasts after the 9-month intervention ends.
- The exact mechanism of benefit was unclear because medication changes and self-management behavior may both have contributed.
Unlock Full Analysis
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Sources
ADA Standards of Care in Diabetes - 2025
Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024
Type 2 diabetes in adults: management
A Guide for People with Type 2 Diabetes | American Diabetes Association
Diabetes in America: Prevalence, Statistics, and Economic Impact
Diabetes Medication | ADA
Managing Diabetes
Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2022. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD)
Impact of 12-Month mHealth Home Telemonitoring on Clinical Outcomes in Older Individuals With Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Effects of Vitamin C and/or E Supplementation on Glycemic Control and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Subgroup Meta-analysis.
Cardiometabolic and Renal Outcomes in Semaglutide Users with Type 2 Diabetes Achieving Glycemic and Weight Goals: An Observational Cohort Study.
Progression of albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over 24 years in people with type 2 diabetes. Drivers, potential protectors and associated mortality.
No ads. No tracking
A clean, privacy-first research experience.
Secure & private
Your data is always protected.
Always up to date
New studies added every day.