Empagliflozin reduces mortality in real-world type 2 diabetes patients, including those excluded from pivotal trials
Key takeaway:
A trial emulation using UK primary care data from 62,503 people with type 2 diabetes found that empagliflozin reduced the risk of death by 24% compared with DPP-4 inhibitors, with consistent benefits in patients who would have been excluded from the original EMPA-REG trial.
Study at a glance
Study type
Cohort
duration
Long-Term (1–5 y), Extended (5–20+ y)
Intervention
Empagliflozin
Outcomes
All-cause mortality
Funding
Non-industry sponsored
What was studied
Real-world mortality benefit of empagliflozin in broader type 2 diabetes populations
What they found
- All-cause mortality ↓ by 24% with empagliflozin vs DPP-4 inhibitors (aHR 0.76)
- Consistent benefit in RCT-ineligible patients (83% of real-world users)
- NNT of 47 to prevent one death over 3 years
mainEffects
All-cause mortality ↓ by 24% with empagliflozin vs DPP-4 inhibitors (aHR 0.76)
Consistent benefit in RCT-ineligible patients (83% of real-world users)
NNT of 47 to prevent one death over 3 years
Evidence Suggest
- Empagliflozin was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality compared with DPP-4 inhibitors across the full study population (adjusted HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.83).
- The mortality benefit was consistent regardless of whether patients met EMPA-REG RCT eligibility criteria (p-interaction=0.27), supporting broader real-world use.
- Sensitivity analyses using IPTW and E-values confirmed the robustness of findings against potential unmeasured confounding.
Who this applies to
These findings apply to adults with type 2 diabetes who are candidates for SGLT2 inhibitor therapy, including those without established cardiovascular disease. The results are most relevant to patients managed in primary care settings similar to the UK healthcare system, given the use of THIN database data from 2014 to 2022.
Keep in Mind
This was not a randomized trial - it used statistical methods to try to replicate what an RCT would find. The active comparator design (DPP-4 inhibitors vs placebo) helps reduce bias, but unmeasured factors like frailty could still affect results. The study did not examine safety outcomes or other SGLT2 inhibitors besides empagliflozin.
Between the Lines
- Observational design means residual confounding is possible despite rigorous methods.
- Cause-specific mortality data were not available, so only all-cause mortality could be assessed.
- The study used UK primary care data, so results may not apply to all healthcare settings.
- Safety outcomes were not assessed in this analysis.
Unlock Full Analysis
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Sources
Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025
ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases (2019)
NICE guideline: Type 2 diabetes in adults: management (NG28)
Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the ADA and the EASD
A Guide for People with Type 2 Diabetes | American Diabetes Association
Diabetes in America: Prevalence, Statistics, and Economic Impact
Diabetes Medication | ADA
Driver's License Information | ADA
Insulin Resistance & Type 1 | ADA
SGLT2 Inhibitor Use and Cardiorenal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes With Liver Cirrhosis.
Efficacy and safety of novel antidiabetic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a network meta-analysis.
Comparative effectiveness and prescribing patterns of dapagliflozin vs empagliflozin in type 2 diabetes patients: a target trial emulation.
Cardiorenal Outcomes of Dapagliflozin vs. Empagliflozin in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes.
No ads. No tracking
A clean, privacy-first research experience.
Secure & private
Your data is always protected.
Always up to date
New studies added every day.