Insulin TherapyDevices & Monitoring
RESUMEN DE INVESTIGACIÓN

Needle-free insulin injection improves blood sugar control and reduces pain in hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients

Moderate confidence
some concerns bias
Última actualización 7 de mayo de 2026

Punto clave:

A 12-day study in 63 hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients found that needle-free insulin injection achieved better blood sugar control, reduced glucose swings, and caused less pain than conventional insulin pens.

Estudio de un vistazo

Qué se estudió

Needle-free insulin injection compared to conventional insulin pens in hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients

Tipo de estudio

Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)

duration

Short-Term (≤3 mo)

Intervención

Needle-free injection

Resultados

Fasting Plasma Glucose, Postprandial glucose, Time in range, Glucose variability, Serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol, Time to target glucose control, Hypoglycemia events, Injection-site adverse events, Injection-associated pain, Treatment satisfaction, Daily insulin dose

Financiamiento

No financiado por la industria

mainEffects

↓ Fasting plasma glucose (mean reduction 7.24 mmol/L in NFI vs 5.82 mmol/L in CIP, p<0.05)

↓ Postprandial glucose (mean reduction 8.65 mmol/L in NFI vs 6.68 mmol/L in CIP, p<0.05)

↑ Time in range (83.6% in NFI vs 76.8% in CIP, p<0.01)

Evidence Summary

InterventionOutcomeMeasured ChangeStudy Effect
Devices & Technology
Needle-free injection
(Devices & Technology)
Glycemic Control
Daily insulin dose
(Glycemic Control)
Uncertain
Limited
Devices & Technology
Needle-free injection
(Devices & Technology)
Glycemic Control
Fasting Plasma Glucose
(Glycemic Control)
Decrease
Strong
Devices & Technology
Needle-free injection
(Devices & Technology)
Glycemic Control
Glucose variability
(Glycemic Control)
Decrease
Strong
Devices & Technology
Needle-free injection
(Devices & Technology)
Safety
Hypoglycemia events
(Safety)
Uncertain
Limited
Devices & Technology
Needle-free injection
(Devices & Technology)
Patient-Reported
Injection-associated pain
(Patient-Reported)
Decrease
Strong
Devices & Technology
Needle-free injection
(Devices & Technology)
Safety
Injection-site adverse events
(Safety)
Decrease
Strong
Devices & Technology
Needle-free injection
(Devices & Technology)
Glycemic Control
Postprandial glucose
(Glycemic Control)
Decrease
Strong
Devices & Technology
Needle-free injection
(Devices & Technology)
Glycemic Control
Serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol
(Glycemic Control)
Increase
Strong
Devices & Technology
Needle-free injection
(Devices & Technology)
Glycemic Control
Time in range
(Glycemic Control)
Increase
Strong
Devices & Technology
Needle-free injection
(Devices & Technology)
Glycemic Control
Time to target glucose control
(Glycemic Control)
Decrease
Strong
Devices & Technology
Needle-free injection
(Devices & Technology)
Patient-Reported
Treatment satisfaction
(Patient-Reported)
Increase
Strong

Unlock Full Evidence Analysis

Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • Needle-free insulin injection achieved significantly better glycemic control than conventional insulin pens during short-term intensive therapy
  • Glucose variability was reduced with needle-free injection, as shown by higher time in range and lower glycemic excursion amplitudes
  • Needle-free devices caused substantially less injection pain and improved patient satisfaction without increasing hypoglycemia risk
who this applies

Who this applies to

This study enrolled hospitalized adults aged 18-70 with type 2 diabetes requiring intensive insulin therapy, including newly diagnosed patients with HbA1c ≥9% or FPG ≥11.1 mmol/L, or those with persistent poor control despite 3 months of oral medications. Average participants were in their early 40s, overweight, and had moderately high baseline glucose levels.

keep in mind

Keep in Mind

This was a very short study in a hospital setting with intensive monitoring that may not reflect real-world outpatient use. The open-label design means participants and staff knew which device was being used, which could affect subjective outcomes like pain and satisfaction ratings. Longer studies are needed to determine if these benefits persist over months or years and whether needle-free devices improve long-term adherence and outcomes. The study also didn't assess cost-effectiveness or device availability issues.

between the lines

Between the Lines

  • Very short study duration (12 days) limits understanding of long-term effectiveness and sustainability
  • Small sample size (63 participants) from single hospital reduces generalizability
  • Conducted only in hospitalized patients, unclear if results apply to outpatient settings
  • Open-label design may have influenced subjective outcomes like pain and satisfaction

Unlock Full Analysis

Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.

Already have an account?

Referencia de la Revista

Wang J, Liu Z, Jiao L, et al. Efficacy and safety of needle-free injection in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing intensive insulin therapy: a randomized controlled trial based on the flash glucose monitoring system. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2026;16:1652388. doi:10.3389/fendo.2025.1652388

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.